Johansen under the employment law Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Johansen under the employment law - Case Study ExampleJohansen is protected under deed VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. As stated in Schultz, 45 because she is a female and, therefore, falls under protected class and she applied for the job in the company having met all the required qualifications. These put her the ability to contest the reason for termination.Johansens right to sue cannot be waived regardless of the Arbitration/intermediation clause she had signed with the company. It is illegal to take away an individuals right to sue in a court of law (Schultz 43). Furthermore, the close cannot be binding because Momma Mia misrepresented the contact in the first place.Johansen can seek remedy because her profile is tainted by the guilty by connecter since she was involved in a publicized case. Her career was ruined by firing her and future employers may also decline to hire her by looking at her history as a whistling blower for the previous company. Since she is not th e one who breached the shoot, Johansen is entitled to the agreed contract fee for the five long time amounting to $450,000 that is, $90,000/year for 5 years. Moreover, Momma Mia should cover all the court fees and costs.d entering into a contract with the company, since Momma Mia never disclosed the full nature of her services, which included client escort - something that went against her religious beliefs.